The Broken Promise of Social Media
We were not naive. We believed.
In the early years of social networking, the promise was genuine and powerful: technology
could connect people across geography, rebuild frayed communities, and give ordinary
individuals a voice.
For a period, it delivered. Families stayed close across time zones. Movements organized
that could not have organized before. Long-lost friends found each other. The internet felt,
briefly, like it was working for people.
That promise has since been spent. The companies did not set out to cause harm. They set out
to grow. But growth required engagement, engagement required attention, and attention is
reliably captured through anxiety, comparison, and outrage. The algorithm did not care
whether a member felt better or worse after opening the app. It cared whether they came back.
We built tools to connect us. Somewhere along the way, they started connecting us to their
business model instead.
The result is a generation of products that are technically social but functionally
isolating. Feeds surface conflict because conflict keeps people scrolling. Notifications are
engineered to manufacture urgency. Privacy defaults are set to maximize data extraction, not
member comfort.
We don't believe the people running these companies are villains. We believe they are
caught in a structure that makes it impossible to choose the member over the metric. Publicly
traded companies answer to their shareholders first; it is their legal and fiduciary
obligation. When the interests of the member and the interests of the shareholder diverge, the
structure decides.
Manifest was built because we believe the structure must be different.